INCREDIBLE SHADRA

Name : Miswari
Class : 2nd Sememester, Post-Graduate Islamic Phylosophy, ICAS-Paramadina
Lesson : Comparative Phylosophy
Lecturer : Dr. Abdulaziz Abbaci

A Work for Final Test:
INCREDIBLE SHADRA
Substance Motion of Mulla Shadra: A Comparison with Hegel's Absolute Spirit Motion

Introduction
Mulla Shadra has substantial motion has unrejectable of modern science. Hegel is also no less. The idea of history has also had evidence of: powerful: the social movements of the hands of Marx. Bouth ‘motions’ is a matter beyond the power of extraordinary. Shadra’s Great thoughts have no yet to find resistance in modern Islamic Philosophy. Likewise in the West, the motion of the substance by Hegel is still a reference to the present Western thinkers.

Substance Motion
The ‘world' which mean here is not merely visible to the eye and nor touched by the skin, we mean the world is the world as a whole, no matter we are able to reach it or not, do not want to know we understand it or not. What which can be known, through the auxiliary ones, are not the same as what is true. Nihilism does not trust anything, anything in question '' what is?'' they reject it. Modern science has formulated a theory of the development of the universe (semesta yang mengembang). Stephen Hawking, the famous astronomist believe it. But all that is included in the review space Hawking can also be designated, may enter into the intellect. So all objects that Hawking is only limited human mind can reach. All that in space (meruang) and in time (mewaktu) rejected by Nietzshe. It Germany philosopher to say that everything is just meruang-mewaktu: pertceiveable and thouhgable. Everything that has meruang-mewaktu, that time is a mind to create space. Intellect is produced by consciousness is moving. All that has mewaktu definitely moving, because there is a move, there must be a change. '' There can be no time when nothing has changed'' McTaggart said, because conditions change is time. Existencialism believe that time mind beyond time (Al-Fayyadl, 2006:19). But what about the mind that is beyond time time?
Human consciousness, which is behind them do not have time, is be motioned? Sense, or intellect is formed by the motion. This motion is continuously active. This continuous motion through the intellect to inspire people to form consciousness. Consciousness is then to realize the space and time simultaneously. Thus, the human mind, is part of the Main Reason that fetched through an intermediary spirit (soul). The intellect of man through the space-time realizing the agency or other materials. The problem is, apriori reason we do not accept a motion without any changes: Any change would be moving, so the pure conceptions of the mind. Iqbal in resolving this issue divides time into two parts. The first time was the formation of our intellect, the second time this is a fabricated joint motion beyond the mind. It's okay to apply changes to the natural sense under reason according to the motion that coincided with the time conceptualized. With this we have to accept that change is also the formation of mind.
The Thinkers before Mulla Shadra did not dare to accept the motion that goes beyond reason, or a substantial motion because he thinks it has not changed substantially since if he changed, he no longer can be called foundation or substance. But here we find that the change is only formed by the mind alone. Necessitates no change in the substance of the motion. '' In the past, before God created anything, God's way. Now, after God created all this, and after this is over, God is still so, Bayazid Bistami’s student said. It signaled it did not change substantially. Change is actual movement toward the better. Because the substance is perfect, then he will not change. The substance is one continuous motion of an infinite effect the human mind is active. This apparently referred to in the Qur'an: '' Every time he in a rush” (Qur'an 55:29). The entire contents of the universe depends on the substance of it: '' Allah is a God, all things depend upon him'' (112 AS.: 2), all accidents, depending on the substance. Iqbal said that even on the dimensions of the perceived after-dimensional world, the human remains as well as due to the substance of yak moving keep moving.
''The world is a giant energy, without beginning, without end, an amount of power a firm, strong, does not enlarge or shrink, not expand themselves, they just change himself; as a whole ...'' (Friedrich Nietzsche). It German's philosopher true sayings when properly observed. for himself the changes do not apply, the change applies only to the observer. Mean 'to change' (mengubah) different from 'changed' (berubah) . 'Changed', according to observers, while the 'to change', according to the subject itself. Then ‘to change’ is equal to 'moved' (bergerak). For the subject, because it is necessary to keep moving. This motion appears apriori, more essence (azali) than reason. This motion is a necessity. This raises awareness portrait (sense) to support the motion itself. When the mind together as well, then comes the categories. These categories determine the barometer we depart from the lack of kindness towards the better. Individuals have the same nature to this, lack of kindness and good judgment are the same because he comes from a pure sense. Therefore, it is the duty of every individual to another individual reminded to remain consistent in the pure reason that so we can move together to form character.
Establishment of an important character in Kant. For Kant, the noumena are not many affordable practical sense, practical sense only have a beat. The substance of the reach of sense. ''If you asked about the Spirit (Ruh), saying 'Spirit of the affairs of my Lord', and not given you the knowledge but little'' (QS: al-Isra ': 85). Things that are not covered can be appreciated through a behavioral sense. Therefore, Kant asks ethics for released from any inclination subject matters perceiveable (terpersepsi) by reason. Pure consciousness needs to be invested early on so that consciousness arises. Here is not enough awareness of the extent of making Heideggar, but awareness of the There is a cause we really need to be fetched. Such awareness makes us understand that we must not stop moving even for a moment. Such awareness is also important that we realize that the object There is not us, but we are only a handful of substantial motion manifest of the stock. There was awareness of Heidegger seems to still anthropocentric.
As individuals and communities, we are shaping the character of motion as mentioned above. The path we take is through the formation containing the intellect, has the expertise to master the law of right thinking and right according to the rules of intellectual nature. Such a form of intellect is necessary for consciousness, when we have been in space and time, intellect the it first appear. The intellect is an expert and contains can lead to a high sensitivity to the form sense. This flavor appreciated by pure ethics, ethics is not bounded on causation alone, but go beyond the law made sense. When it is implemented in a conscious and well, then it will interact with the noumena we are not able to explain the reason though. Spirituality will merge with us. This is our hope. Spiritual oneness with the self-direct delivery of intelligent emotional character. This is our hope. And when this is realized, we have followed the laws of motion substantially. Denial of the laws of motion that causes crash individual moral and destruction of a civilization. Achievement of the new substance motion law achieved if we implement them collectively. Therefore, its formation must begin shaping the character of intellectual community. The concentration of intellectual society, and emotionally intelligent is intelligent spiritual information through media advocacy. We have described a stack of issues of nationality, one of which is too far striking media and opinion for the benefit of a handful of the capital.

Mulla Shadra
A philosopher would be great if his presence could provide a solution to the conundrum faced by the Ummah. Conundrum was never be soluted that it was he who melted all. Its presence is different from the fall of an Apostle who practically have to make contact with his people. He came not as a superhero who needs temporary help and then fly again. Philosophers do not like them all. But according to history, we can characterize them, at least as follows: initially hated, reviled, rejected, and after much time had passed, he will be sought, revered and languish honour without which they will: even though at that time the philosopher had gone. Society, or rather, someone or some people, have to wait so that the philosopher of his birth can be understood. Philosopher rather than a hero in his day. Similarly, a Mulla Shadra.
Our partner, Mulyani'' Azzam'' has become a good friend when he was able to give an explanation that I can understand the meaning of 'ashlahatul wijud’ and 'ashlahatul mahiyah'. Azzam said, thinking 'ashlahatul wujud’ more complex and profound than ashlahatul mahiyah. Ashlahatul mahiyah had stopped on when a quidity formed. Quidity formation in an understanding of the truth itself. According to the ashlahatul mahiyah, Azzam said. But if we understand it is the truth itself? According to the ashlahatul wujud, what we understand it is not the truth as it is. Do blue sky as I see on a clear day it's really the blue colored?
Modern science, Azzam said, really has support on material essence. Because, it turns out what we are perceive is not what it is. But the science is able to unpack the mystery object observations, we do not seem like not understand anything, the more we were puzzled. After all, science is not the standard glasses of pure truth, subatomic microscope observation limitation and also makes certain point of view according to his ability, how it is the same as the way humans work. Knowledge perspective also means embracing quidity essence (ashalatul mahiyah) own. Azzam’s another explanation, ashalatul wujud is superior beings ashlahatul mahiyah because he is in human nature more deeply. Citing explanation Musa Kazim, Azzam pointed to a baby who is capable of capturing and storing the shape (form) in mind but have not been able to capture the meaning in his mind. This argument seems to be a reason that the form contains more essential than meaning. According to the ashalatul wujud, something more essential is the realization. Its existing form by itself, apriori, more than that, he is ‘badhihi’. For example, an infant, he was able to distinguish between being and not directly. Because, according to the arguments of the ashlahatul wujud, form does not need verification. Many things that need verification, but 'being' there's no need to prove. But can we believe the argument like this? Each form must contain mahiyah, and vice versa (sebaliknya). But about which of the two was the more essential, that the philosophers who moot.
Mulla Shadra is often blamed as the plagiarist's philosophy works. Their reasons for seeing the works rather than excerpts Shadra is the work of previous philosophers. Shadra often did not name figures he cites. For today's scientific ethics, say the critics, these actions are strictly forbidden. But its defenders, especially those in Hawzah Ilmiyyah, Qumm, Shadra does not make the work philosophy of the quote before the work of philosophers only, but many pieces of original thought in it. For example, such as Murtadha Mutahhari’s opinion in the ‘Filsafat Hikmah' (Bandung: Mizan, 2002, p. 77-78) said (1) because the arguments that have been quoted is not new and has been populist, like how Al-Ghazali in 'Tahafut al-Fasasifah', (2) after all Shadra claimed all the content in his work rather than his argument as a whole, so Shadra does not claim that all content is his private arguments, this is important because generally, the work of a plagiarist is trying to hew his personal property, in this case , Shadra is not so, (3) Mutahhari Shadra describes this work is a work of philosophy, so the work of philosophy, like science, is not formed from the void or the pilot, but to construct the arguments or the prior art, (4) some with literary works constructed personal, subjective, and apart from any other kind. Mutahhari also explains, the work ‘Hikmah Muta'aliyah' is synonymous with Shadra, but Shadra is not triggered by Ibn Sina (Avicenna) who started it, and it is recognized Shadra himself.
Just as Ibn Sina, Shadra is Ashlahatul Wujud wing philosopher. Previously, the more likely the teacher of Shadra, Mir Damad, which are more likely to ashlahatul mahiyah. As we've mentioned above regarding the existence (being) and essence (mahiyah). In my view, every being into being (be there) must have been through mahiyah, and every being into being, surely necessitates mahiyah back to hold a shape, and so on without stopping, so it appears it is difficult for us to determine what the ashlahatul, shape or mahiyah. Therefore, Mutahhari (p. 82) says the Peripatetic who believe in ashalatul wujud and The Illuminasionis is who believe in ashlahatul mahiyah not have a thorough grounding. In the work of Mulla Shadra, is considered as mediator between feuding Peripatetic and Illuminasionis, Mutahhari (p. 83) claimed to find nothing contradictory between the two schools will this (?)
About the unity of form, Mutahhari been confused in this regard. He was difficult to identify a variety of opinions on the idea of existence as anyone. In one argument to say that existence is not as such sightings. There is the argument that accused Suhrawardi. There is the argument that the existence of the united, not plural, Mutahhari suspect that his argument of the 'wise. That the existence of a compound that is univocally, while the equivocal must be united, this argument seems Peripatetic. While understanding that the existence of a graded unite diverse sekalugus were his Pahlawi, philosophical schools of ancient Persia. But, Mutahhari own claim that every point of view this can not belong to a certain flow digeberalisir because kebercampuran perspective by each flow. For example, the Peripatetic also had thoughts similar to the Pahlawi. Gradation apparently embraced by the flow of Peripatetic, Illuminasionis and Ibn Arabi, but the difference is only in the use of the term. Is this true? The answer is: not entirely true nor false.
The hallmark of Islamic philosophy is to provide opportunities so that where mental appears it is a way for us to acquire knowledge, either by observation, reasonable, and may also involve mental intuition. Throughout the history of philosophy, denial and a defense of empiricism and rationalism continued to wrestle. The defenders of the rationalist argument shows the weakness of empirical and benefits ratio, instead of empiricism to explain the tips of the advantages of experience rather than rationally, thus continues. Henry Bergson has recently offered a new argument about the superiority of intuition. According to him, reason and experience both can’t not be the basis for both have drawbacks. Therefore, he proposes that only intuition alone can’t doubt its superiority. I look at the empirical, reason and intuition is a linear process, not something that should be debated. An understanding is an uncontested belief for the self-understanding. Conditions like these are probably intended Bergson. But anyway, to get to an understanding, it is impossible there by itself: (sim salabin or abracadabra). In addition, all claiming to understand Illuminasionis sensory perception only the disclosure of what has been understood only assumption. It If true, then he would not be contrary to what we want to. That in order to intuition, the beginning was the sense of capturing the experience of reality. In this case we must rely on the belief Empiricism. The ratio also does not work in sim salabin or abracadabra. The ratio was only constructed after the introduction of empirical experience. I might not even be able to think or admit myself there without my ever any experience. Impossible. Yet we confess that which makes us think is what we experience. The results of processing the results of empirical experience by a ratio of up to mature well that's called intuition. 'That's why Bergson himself says intuition is a high level of intellect (see: Iqbal, Yogyakarta: Jalasutra, 2002, p. 17). Debate between the primacy of empirical, rationality and intuition is ridiculous.
The next thing we will point out that about causation. Causation, such as Yazdi rich in 'Buku Daras Filsatat Islam’: because it is necessary to stop at the Main Cause that is no longer needed cause. Similarly, due, shall expire on the last result can’t be a cause for an effect anymore. Something used as a result of earlier is the way things work in processing the ratio of empirical data. Thus, the existence of cause and effect is the production of the intellect. Once again, the trigger is constructed empirical intellect experience as well. Thinkers who deny the existence of causality is the as Hume's empiricism. Because, they do not recognize the benefits of the ratio. When Yazdi (Yazdi, 2010) said there should be the main reasons that led from the first, meaning the first result gives a limit on the first cause that he is recognized as the first cause (Iqbal, 2002, p. 65). When the first cause can lead to a result first, then the quality of the first cause must be the same as the first result. That way, there is no reason to deny the ability of the first result is also able to bring a first cause. Similarly, due to last-mentioned are not able to create a new cause for no reason. Once again, the law of cause and effect is merely formed by the mind. Because if the President is often regarded as a God, then the argument that says God is formed by reason alone. Mutahhari (ps. 92-93) explains, the first is because, the second and the third is the result of, arising from both the existence or form. Existence of causality is only in our minds only, the reality is not like that. Mind to make cause and effect are separated now, but according to Mutahhari, clumsy due to the raised therefore is identical with the cause itself. As we know, intellectually conceptualize it works with physical things. Drafting terms of physics is pinned by a sense as a way of knowing things metaphysical. Therefore, the intellectual, physical and metaphysical terms it looks as if identical. Sense, with all its pros and cons dragging things into the metaphysical law of causality. It would seem that intuition is more reliable as an offer worth Iqbal. But how to make that intuition is not objective because it’s publicly owned and it’s is relative to each one who has? And, how intuition can be trusted absolutely, not it’s also is of the senses and the intellect that it is doubtful it: how can we believe anything it’s is of questionable things.
The next issue discussed was about Shadra’s substance motion. Iqbal by Leaman main principle of reality is constantly changing ('Pengantar Filsafat Islam’, Bandung: Mizan, 2001, p. 36). In fact, according to Iqbal in the afterlife even though people still continue to move to get up get to know who he is. I am reminded of Eid al-Fitr sermon one who said one time the Garden will be able to see God's face directly. And this is the peak pleasure. This implies continued to proceed toward heaven pleasure peak people. Similarly, the Garden also proceed to get there through the phases of the so-called torture.
'' Natural materials do move substantially,'' said evolutionary Mutahhari (p. 99). Iqbal thought is similar to Shadra. As explained Mutahhari (p. 97), for Shadra, substance and overall aksidennya experienced continuous motion, no objects in nature that are stagnant. Ibn Rusyd (Averroes) by Leaman (p. 37) says is the whole of nature, then nature is created in a time impossible.
In 'Fisafat Shadra' (Bandung: Pustaka, 2000, p. 25), Fazlur Rahman explains that Mulla Shadra embracing the concept of Harakah Jauhar. This concept means that the movement comes from movement to movement that implicates nonmaterial material. The philosophers before Shadra did not dare to give birth to a concept like this because they think that it can’t be considered non material moving, as if moving it would change (in accordance them understanding of the experience of the material), they must be changed according to perfection, if still not perfect means to ; God is nonmaterial, non material change so it is impossible for God is already perfect.
In the category of philosophical substance in Suhrawardi’s makkulatul tsani only accept body, soul and intellect. According to the form and have been contained in the matter and the mattter is the content rather than body. Rejection is what makes the theory of motion of Suhrawardi only accidental. While Mulla Shadra asserts Form and Matter is important categories that need to be dealt with separately and should be clarified so that each of these ideas make Suhrawardi was the first thinker who found substantial theory motion.: Motion is a change from one form to another. Changes that are of potential (quwah) to actualization (fi'li). Changes to the actualization of potential necessitates four elements: (1) mutaharriq (moving), (2) mutaharrih (moving, (3) musafah (distance), and (4) waqt (the time).
Accordong to Kerwanto’s analogy, the difference between the concept of motion Peripatetic with Philosophy of Hikmah is like a person wearing the clothes and then open it again for the Peripatetic wear and wear again and again without undressing long for wisdom. I am impressed with the concept of substantial motion for synergies with quantum theory popularized by Hessenberg.
The narrow way of thinking of the philosophers before Shadra may also be due to the pressure of the theologians. But they are also wrong to think God is static. After all non-moving material to affect the motion of matter is not necessarily God; non material is not God. In fact, as informed Al-Qur'an: God himself is always in a rush. To easily understand the motion, said Mr. Musa Kazim, we must first analyze the elements of movement. First there is a moving subject, there are two initial positions (or potential), then there are the phases of the movement towards action (a form after the change) and some form after the change itself. Or the duration of that phase in the glasses of the observer is called time. So time itself in this case, relative to the observer. But the subject, the action potential and in fact is one substance. And because time here is the fourth dimension is relative, then there's the motion? Because the process itself apply in time. Because time is relative, then the motion is relative anyway. This means that motion is also included limitation by reason. Necessitates limiting sense of causality and change its position to know. Both the shape and form of the action potential is also equally a form which means the introduction of the senses and reason. Once again, common sense and perception of nature is through the limitation.
To prove harakah jauhariyah, that the non-material nature there is also evidenced by the movement of time there, we can see that there are also valid duration. Our sacred texts say a thousand years in here, one day there.

Reason History of Hegel
Hegel is included'' footnotes'' of Plato. He should impose that Reason shape history. He expressed disappointment in saying Anaxagoras natureshape history (Hegel, 'Nalar dalam Sejarah', Jakarta: Teraju, p. 20). We know that the human understanding before Plato is not man-centered, even long before the Greek natural philosophers, men claimed to yield to nature. It's not entirely because in some parts of the East, actual human beings are not controlled by nature, but friendly with it. But before Thales or some earlier philosophers, especially in the West, have a natural claim to the extraordinary power that human beings should be subject to full and there is even a worship of nature. Only Thales is the philosopher or some previous attempts to know nature well and came to the conclusion that nature is inanimate. Based on this conclusion, by Plato and later declared philosopher of humans are superior to nature. With that of men is to make himself as central.
Conclusion is not entirely true philosopher of nature, nature is not really dead. He lives like a human being too. Which included the philosopher Hegel adopts a human as the center but with a claimed control over the history of the human think the spirit of some to deny his own statement when it refused to have any control over their natural history. Hegel was right when claiming that control the spirit of history, but he erred when denying the role of nature. Because the soul is not only beyond human nature, but also beyond. Perhaps precisely is, it is a collection of spirit that transcends human nature as well. Apathy towards nature in this day and age the greater when we believe that it's just a natural sense perception we have. It delivers the conclusion that nature is absolutely under control (sense) man.
When declarate superiority over all, man, through his wits, thus claimed to govern the physical universe. When viewed, it is true, reason, or so it makes sense to conquer whatever the critic control is to control history. But, whole so? Let us see: Reason itself is a constellation of influences. The most influential man is natural. So here, it makes sense only tool or intermediate course, the actual control of the natural history. But if true it's just a perception of natural reason alone, it is only natural for the mind is a mirror to see himself. True means that control is a common history.
Is there anything else out of mind that will determine the history, or, if nature just sense perception, then it really makes sense, something strange, lonely, which determines the single itself is a small part of itself called 'history'. Hegel said that there is something outside of reason that determines the history of God (Hegel: 2005: 21). He recognizes religion as an instrument out of reason that will determine history. But true religion is something beyond reason? To answer that question we need to probe a little about religion. Religion is taken by a man who said the message from the messenger of God through the angel named Gabriel (as). We can only accept God as something beyond reason, but Gabriel alone is Reason itself seems though in the capacity and conditions are somewhat different. In addition, followers of the prophet had the choice to receive messages from transreason can’t help but think his reason, nothing more. With a history that is formed. So here likely formed by a sense of history is correct. And chances are also influenced by it’s trans-reason something is true as well. Reason is ambiguous, it’s have no limit, God himself can sometimes also called ‘Reason’. Level of human reasoning is not limited and limitless.
“Hegel was religious thinker”, Fristian said. He wanted the message over the religion of reason that can be applied objectively. Apparently this is a problem for the understanding of the environment of Christianity and its interpretation is very diverse and difficult to put together. Objectivity is required so that religion can be understood together to be part of reason that can be applied to be part of history. In the realm of the spirit, Hegel says people can find freedom. Freedom which he means here is very abstract, because it is his spirit of nature itself is ambiguous, not clear. This looks almost the same nature with his There Heidegger. This is the nature of darkness and obscurity. Human freedom, or free will exists only in his mind or the universal idea that space. On the nature of matter, there is no such thing as free will. Any action you want performed should follow the limitations and the natural laws of matter. It may be a small but in mind that it happens great, or vice versa. What is clear is that freedom exists only in idea, the individual nature. In fact it seems that there is freedom in the idea itself is affected, or at least inspired by the nature of matter.
Look at all the product of man, taken from the symptoms and the symptoms they natural reality. The aircraft inspired birds, fish inspired by the submarine. There needs to be a party man who has the authority to realize the ideas. They should have the best ideas are the most useful and beneficial to all without harming anyone or anything. But unfortunately, Hegel (p. 66) allowing the individual the subject of history is the same as doing the evils and he was resistant to it by reason of the strength of purpose and ideals. Hegel's statement is not entirely wrong. The issue is whether someone who claims to receive messages from the Absolute Spirit is indeed true of the Absolute Spirit. All admitted that he fought for the pure of Absolute Spirit, but is it just the way the application is contrary to, or indeed any one or some of it is actually just thought it met the Absolute Spirit.
Absolute Spirit has the power so that idea can be realized in a particular world. This realization is through the realization of all the particulars by him. Especially for humans, they have a certain level in this case: The man who is closer to the absolute spirit are those who have the desire and the desire to realize the Absolute Idea into a particular reality. Those close to it may fail to fulfill his desire because of many obstacles from those who are far from the idea of Absolute Spirit. Their success or failure does not matter, as long as they try and be consistent for the Spirit to apply its own Absolute Idea. Absolute like bodies that do not have any limitations in the struggle for the achievement of the Absolute Idea. Therefore, the body remains constant change, continuing the previous ideas to reach the Absolute Idea. Every body instead in universe renew itself with a new one so that the productivity of his fight for the Absolute become more efficient.
Absolute Idea is the desire to realize the innate potential of human reason is a true manifestation of that idea. Hegel said that through the realization of ethics that seem to embody the Absolute Idea in history. This concept seems inspired from the ideas of Kant. Kant says things can be explained by metaphysical philosophy but appreciated by ethics. Because it is a manifestation of Absolute Idea, humans have the burden of responsibility in realizing the Absolute Idea. This goal led to the denial of human nature reject idea to make it happen. But nature is to apply a lot of barriers to its realization. Therefore, negotiations between the ideas is necessary. Hegel said that older people tend to age more amenable to negotiation than a younger, more idealistic. This is because an old seems to have realized a lot of his ideas fail, so they chose to negotiate rather than not at all: it would be realized. If it's only a handful of persons are piggybacking on the Absolute Idea to be realized, then we tend to think of the Absolute Idea is not realized in the external reality, but in fact everything that happens in nature, everything even the hint of rain and wind is nevertheless Absolute Idea.
In the view of Hegel, the state is a means or a place to realize the idea Absolute. But when gathered in the country, realized not a single individual's Idea, in the state, respectively, and none met Idea own of individual thorough, it is a synthesis of each of the Idea. Seems the state constitution is an abstraction of the idea of all citizens: It is expected all citizens to be obedient against the rules because the concept is the doer of the law made it. According to Hegel, the objective law that is practiced all proper rational citizens.
But how could the people who can contribute tens of millions in number or may be considered his ideas have been covered in the constitution? It seemed improbable. Therefore thinkers after Hegel interested in discussing this issue. As Foucoult example, he will that knowledge is at once a strength so that knowledge can be applied. In this regard, Imam Khomaini implementing a brilliant strategy. He makes some of the most have the knowledge gathered in Wilayatul Faqih weeks to make the state constitution. Severity in the majority of countries, the law was made for the interests of some people. Law must be obeyed billions of people, they must submit to the interests of some people-oriented material, property. Billions of people marched to support the achievement of corporate interests of some people, they can’t avoid: hew be unlawful.
When said state is the realization of freedom, Hegel is not guilty. He was imagine an organization where its members protect each other and each may realize his freedom. It's society is a society that works for the master, both for landlords and kings. Here Hegel insists his frustration at the religious institutions that used for the benefit of landlords and kings. Community anesthetized with religious texts are interpreted in such a way as to fool the public. Oppressed people who do not have any choice really happy with the drugs and even deliberately drugged themselves. Departing from the trauma of this experience, many thinkers suggested that the state does not carry religious concepts. State policy should be purely rational. In the country and hoped that all policy decisions taken objectively. A state has a goal that all people free from all forms of oppression even argue on any grounds.
The state is so objective. But at the present time the class was actually based on a collective level of the state. The people of the world powers to suppress the people of poor nations, strong nations been able to come together for the welfare of its people. But that applies to the weak state, an organization called the country gather for the oppressed people in constitutional, legal oppression. The Constitution and the laws drawn up by the multitude of people from the powers of the state through its agents who are also weak citizens. All the products are built based on the constitution and laws of corporate interests and the desire for a strong country folk. This model of colonization, a new style colonialism. Even many thinkers who are desperate with the presence of religion in the state, Hegel is not the case. He rejects secularism and religion and the state make sure that have very deep relationships. Religion is the heart of the human conscience, how can the state be separated from man, so how can people be separated from religion. So the idea of secularism is most unreasonable. But it seems that religion is not intended Hegel is kind constitution of Christian and Protestant, but religion in Hegel's view is more similar to what the teacher said, Immanuel Kant, which is a natural condition of human nature with man's own making.
According to Hegel (2005: 98), states that provide based of religion. Humans do not have the loyalty and obedience purely on particular matters. A section of people may be loyal to things that are rational for several reasons, but this rationality and its temporal and relative. The rejection against something that is rational is very possible. Humans will only be loyal to God, to religious institutions did not. Therefore, the religious meaning should not be linked to religious schools that have been confirmed. Religious sects and the flow is modified by rationalizations. Countries that are not grounded in God alone will come to fruition because people only have true loyalty and devotion that the God only. Countries based on other than God's will collapse easily. The collapse of a religion is incalculable amount of harm. In to its collapse, a state must have sacrificed the lives and security of millions of people. In building a new system state takes quite a bit. Blood, can be spilled again.
Hegel seems to make religion as the foundation and essence of the country. He (h.102 said only the state religion and no state can be formed, he says, art and philosophy can’t be formed. He was always sure motion the Spirit World. Effect of this movement to form individuals who have the awareness that they must not violate the Holy Principles Absolute. Each step must follow the motion of the Absolute Motion of this substance. Friedrick Nietzsche says of this nature is a room that still, silent, rigid, static (Graham Higgin, 'Antologi Filsafat', Yogyakarta: Bentang, 2004:166). Iqbal 2002: 190) mention is Nietzsche's time serial repetition. Apparently thinking this is the spirit Nietzsce dieariskan Hegel. '' There is nothing new under the sun'' says Hegel (h.105). The world is moving, but nothing changed. Everything to perfection is impossible. This world'' ... without purpose, unless ring excitement as the goal itself, without the will, unless the circle that will feel good with himself'' said Nietzsce. Iqbal immediately sentenced the concept of time that Nietzsche was wrong with it while rejecting Hegel. But both these Western philosophers mean time series producted by our intellect, not the '' Time'' is beyond reason (if it exists). Hegel and Nietzsche agree that perfection is not affordable, and energy is limitless time. But doctrine to be defended Iqbal was also not rejected, it is bounded nature, reason can’t reach beyond the nature of this dimension. But the motion reasonable substance continues blessed for establish new and better dimension, which apparently was not perceived by our minds, though perhaps only now referred to the development of this sense. Hegel said that the spirit came into the material. But for me it's the sort of material that forms the set of spiritual energy, then form a sub-atomic energy, atomic and sub atomic form atom to form objects. This constellation is because the spirit of continuous motion. This seems to be called a substance motion.
Gerak substansi (substance motion) characteristics manifest in reality. There an ultimate reality in the human intellect. Human beings are possessed better race is the highest peak of the reality. We know that the negotiations between individuals is inevitable. Therefore, the interaction between people, between cultures and civilizations will be won by Reason individuals and communities that are superior, better incarnation of the spirit in him. Abdul Hadi WM in ‘Falsafah India' says that the Indians had been conquered by the Persians to the religion of Persia sustainable fire there. The next person who left Persia again so now Hindu India even identical to the old religion itself has abandoned the Persians themselves. With that, the teachings are applicable in China and the archipelago is the heritage of Persian also means that even if the people know it from India. Persian mystic character bequeathed to the East. To the West, Persia brings consistently strong intellect. Through a variety of the Eastern Roman conquest, the Persians subsequently able birth the natural philosophers who list their names officially sustainable to date. The natural phylosophers it is okay to be known as Greek. But actually they are from Turkey who obtained freedom of ideas in a relatively remote from the physical war Greece. Furthermore, the humanity of the philosopher Plato also was metamarfosisis natural philosophy.
After Islam came, the Arabs could only partially implement the concept. The application of religion in this way is almost similar to a recorder which is capable of displaying fine but do not understand. After Islam came to Persia, then religion is getting a good conscience. Islam through the Persians find harmony between nature books with the Book of Gabriel. This meeting gave birth to the glorious heyday difficult equaled until whenever. The names of great Muslim scientists also almost all were Persian. The Ahlul Bayt such as Al-Ghazali and many other scientists may have succeeded in spreading his teachings, but even if they are of Arab descent, without mixing with the blood of the Persians, then they will still like a camel in the desert valleys of the peninsula. The propagator of Islam to the Ahlul Bayt archipelago but even they must have taken a Persia that it means they have mingled with the blood-rich Persian intellect. Perhaps the people of Aceh, the first Islamic taken by Salman Al-Pharisees to the archipelago. Sharif Hidayatullah, a descendant of the Prophet. Also bleed Persia before blood Samudra Pasai (Muhammad Said, 'Aceh Sepanjang Abad' Vol. I).
The Apostles always emerged from among the Israelites, but the Persians it was'' prophet''. If the Apostles who were visited by guests from Israel Gabriel through his brain, then Gabriel's own blood to flow in each of the Persians. Persian mix is not very good, but a combination of Gabriel in the sky with Gabriel on the earth in an Ahlul Bayt is remarkable for several sides. Germans are famous most intelligent people in the West it was the Persians who emigrated, as do other Persians to the Romans, and other archipelago. Germany and Iran are both the most superior, the Aryans. Hitler is not a matter of doctrine. The abject of this archipelago to see for yourself, not just with the eyes, but all my good looks or not. So here I say: When the Germans cleared out of Israel, then Israel would have looked for revenge on Iran's Arya. When a child is still mighty tough Germans still claim to be Aryans, so if Iran conflict with Israel and her American, Germany must defend Iran. In history, only the Persians are the master of the East West. All the strength and intellect West today is East own. Westerners actually as father (berbapak) on the East. On the occupation of East West is a recent century is a story of the murder of a child against his father. Or it could be seen as well as a sense of betrayal at the heart.
Unfortunately, Hegel gave a strange criterion to something called 'history'. In the criteria, the history should be a synthesis of thesis and antithesis to be balanced with. In Hegel’s opinion, India has not even had a history of exceptional character, the reason India is a caste system are standard. There's only power Brahmin caste, they are set up around the joints. There is no competition there, empire was static, so continuous. Though Al-Attas Naquib prefer the script as an indicator that signifies the highest height of a civilization. Maybe with the indicator, Hegel can refute by saying it is not history. History for Hegel to be an active movement which embodies the substance of the motion. If so, then that history would not exist. Therefore, there will be no friction balance. Any civilization or culture that will never be balanced.
Laws of nature make conflict and conflict always appears. This opposition stopped when there is anything rubbing the win. Then there is one that outperformed the other is a history because of the conflict has passed. Therefore, we must be able to distinguish between 'history' and 'the movement of history'. The movement of history is a process, while the history is the result it conflict. A caste is history. But it’s not really 'history' because the losing continues moving to the beat and win well to keep moving to maintain.
Till today, to keep moving whenever history. Today some big corporation that is established ruler. No one is able to disturb. If follow the concept of Hegel, the history and then stop. Hegel was right when said Spirit was moving, but do not got a antithesis-thesis system. It's just easier knowledge system to know the motion, but the truth is not the movement of the Spirit. Moreover, analogous to the external reality, must be wrong. Surprisingly, Hegel claimed that the script is the characteristic quality of civilization, when character is established in a community is a testament to a community that is stable for a long time, thesis-antithesis Hegel was not there, which means there is no history in the eyes of Hegel.
Does Hegel did not know that a great work can only be born in a stable political conditions. In this condition the authorities will not bother with any work, for nothing because his power has been very well established. In addition, the opportunity to create great works of the author only possible when given the conditions, environment and references are qualified. But the intellect is the Spirit of Hegel acknowledged the purest that can be indicated in the external reality. Finally, Hegel makes it clear that reality is a particular embodiment of the spirit'' ... then he can be grasped only spiritually, through the mind.'' Hegel (2005:135). So with this philosophy is the main character in this issue. According to Hegel, philosophy is thinking about the mind. In addition, literature and science are not forgotten (about the subject and the relationship of literature, philosophy and science I have argued in 'Garudaku Tangguh' in part: 'The Ultimate Creations').
'' In general, the history of the world is the development of Spirit in Time, as nature is the development of the Idea in Space'' (Hegel, p. 139). But I saw, that through the thesis-antithesis then of history, something which has established a case example of caste in India, not a history; but it is time. This is what I want to say. Hegel's view quoted above, then my guess it is true. That seems that is particular reality is the time, even though the events is the incarnation of the spirit or the development of substantial motion. At the level of substance, is the development of the spirit; at the level of accidents, is the time. This is in line with the development of ideas at the level of substance and motion in space in the level of accidents.
Because time is an artificial sense, it is certainly causality that often becomes part of the debate is a production philosophy is also reasonable. Causality was in the category of accidents. Causality only in the mind. Then the mind to abstract hand and the door pushed open and pinned to the reality of the law of causality.

Concutions
Phylosophy is don’t accept knowledge what are find by experiecce (Indera) nor what is reason perceived. Phylosopy want to know how is realitiy is (apa yang sesungguhnya). Mulla Shadra is a incredible philosopher. He shows knowledge apa yang sesungguhnya, beyond experience and reason. This philosophy model was adopted by many today physophers. In Western philosophy, looks, Henry Berguson is the first philosopher who is believe that intuition is beyond experience and reason. I prefer Bergson with Heideggar. Heideggar is trying to shows Being but without reason. It’s will reject, there is no any knowledge with out throught reason. Intuition it most throught experience and reason.
Hegel is so cleaver. He can proof that whatever can we perceive is under our intellect. The thinks beyond our intellect is not joining time. Time and space, are only product of our reason. Here sees Postmodernism Phylosophers are miss understood of modern Western Phylosophers.

Sources:
Al-Fayyadl, Muhammad, ‘Derrida’, Yogyakarta: LKIS, 2006
Hadi, Abdul WM , ‘Falsafah India', Jakarta: Fakultas Falsafah dan Agama Universitas Paramadina
Hegel, 'Nalar dalam Sejarah', Jakarta: Teraju, 2005
Higgin, Graham, 'Antologi Filsafat', Yogyakarta: Bentang, 2004
Iqbal, Muhammad, ‘Pembangunan Kembali Pemikiran Agama dalam Islam’ Yogyakarta: Jalasutra, 2002
Leaman, Oliver, 'Pengantar Filsafat Islam’, Bandung: Mizan, 2001
Miswari, , 'Garudaku Tangguh’, Jakarta: PII Press, 2011
Mutahhari, Murtadha, ‘Filsafat Hikmah', Bandung: Mizan, 2002
Rahman, Fazlur 'Filsafat Shadra', Bandung: Pustaka, 2000
Said, Muhammad, 'Aceh Sepanjang Abad' Medan: Waspada (Vol. I)
Yazdi, Muhammad Taqi Misbah, 'Buku Daras Filsatat Islam’ Jakarta: Shara Press, 2010